There is nothing humourous about your review and comedic inspection of Mullen’s “Sleeping with the Dictionary.” With so many predictable turns and so little actually said, I felt as though I were reading the after-note to an un-FDA-approved pharmaceutical commercial, or a GMC extended-cab four-wheeler advertisement (“Mullen uses lyric to rev up the mind” ???) Trumping your own verbosity over any fair spotlighting of Mullen’s work, you verge more on the verbally pornographic than the critical, particularly with your feeble triple-ex manouevre (“exuberant, excessive, exhaustive”). In the future, is it possible you could stick to something more within your grasp, a thumbs-up thumbs-down approach perhaps?

DF