<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Soldiers of Year II</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.constantcritic.com/jordan_davis/the_soldiers_of_year_ii/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.constantcritic.com/jordan_davis/the_soldiers_of_year_ii/</link>
	<description>Timely poetry reviews</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 31 Jul 2010 06:50:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott Bramlett</title>
		<link>http://www.constantcritic.com/jordan_davis/the_soldiers_of_year_ii/comment-page-1/#comment-14</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott Bramlett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Jan 2003 20:10:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.constantcritic.test/jordan_davis/the_soldiers_of_year_ii#comment-14</guid>
		<description>I appreciated this review, in that it seemed to be fairly open-ended, more of an appraisal (would that more reviews be thus) than flat praise or denunciation.  I think that criticism would serve its subjects and readers better by such a lack of didacticism, rather than by the critical tack of tutelage or lecture.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Also, I am curious as to how you got my email address.  &lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Best regards.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Scott Bramlett&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Reply from the editor: &lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
For those of you who have similar curiosity about how you came to be on this list, be curious no more: The Constant Critic list used the Fence announcement list as its springboard. So that&#039;s how.&lt;br&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I appreciated this review, in that it seemed to be fairly open-ended, more of an appraisal (would that more reviews be thus) than flat praise or denunciation.  I think that criticism would serve its subjects and readers better by such a lack of didacticism, rather than by the critical tack of tutelage or lecture.</p>
<p>
Also, I am curious as to how you got my email address.  </p>
<p>Best regards.</p>
<p>Scott Bramlett</p>
<p>Reply from the editor: </p>
<p>For those of you who have similar curiosity about how you came to be on this list, be curious no more: The Constant Critic list used the Fence announcement list as its springboard. So that&#8217;s how.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
