<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Guess Can Gallop</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.constantcritic.com/joyelle_mcsweeney/guess_can_gallop/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.constantcritic.com/joyelle_mcsweeney/guess_can_gallop/</link>
	<description>Timely poetry reviews</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 31 Jul 2010 06:50:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Word Dawg</title>
		<link>http://www.constantcritic.com/joyelle_mcsweeney/guess_can_gallop/comment-page-1/#comment-56</link>
		<dc:creator>Word Dawg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jun 2005 02:54:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.constantcritic.test/joyelle_mcsweeney/guess_can_gallop#comment-56</guid>
		<description>What does this mean...&quot;enacts perversion as revolution&quot;?&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
You mean her games with poetic forms are perverse and this perversity is tantamount to a social movement?  &lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Doesn&#039;t that denigrate the social movement?  And aren&#039;t we really just in the same old postmodern territory that Frederick Jameson warns about in which all politics become hopelessly and inescapably aestheticized?  &lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
I&#039;m afraid your review seems rather meaningless and confused.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What does this mean&#8230;&#8221;enacts perversion as revolution&#8221;?</p>
<p>You mean her games with poetic forms are perverse and this perversity is tantamount to a social movement?  </p>
<p>Doesn&#8217;t that denigrate the social movement?  And aren&#8217;t we really just in the same old postmodern territory that Frederick Jameson warns about in which all politics become hopelessly and inescapably aestheticized?  </p>
<p>I&#8217;m afraid your review seems rather meaningless and confused.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: juan pomponio</title>
		<link>http://www.constantcritic.com/joyelle_mcsweeney/guess_can_gallop/comment-page-1/#comment-55</link>
		<dc:creator>juan pomponio</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 May 2005 17:27:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.constantcritic.test/joyelle_mcsweeney/guess_can_gallop#comment-55</guid>
		<description>I agree wholeheartedly.  Through his aphorisms, Richardson has tapped into some ancient yet ever-vital source of wisdom.  It&#039;s good that he&#039;s being read, and read so well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree wholeheartedly.  Through his aphorisms, Richardson has tapped into some ancient yet ever-vital source of wisdom.  It&#8217;s good that he&#8217;s being read, and read so well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
