<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Columbarium</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.constantcritic.com/ray_mcdaniel/columbarium/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.constantcritic.com/ray_mcdaniel/columbarium/</link>
	<description>Timely poetry reviews</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 07 Aug 2010 11:09:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Louise Mathias</title>
		<link>http://www.constantcritic.com/ray_mcdaniel/columbarium/comment-page-1/#comment-91</link>
		<dc:creator>Louise Mathias</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Aug 2004 08:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.constantcritic.test/ray_mcdaniel/columbarium#comment-91</guid>
		<description>An arresting, intelligent review--&lt;br&gt;
You touch lightly on issues of the sort of enigmatic sensuality in her work that I think also parallel Carson, so they are alike in more ways than lack of cover jacket photo. I think this is part of what makes the work intimate enough to be compelling while very definately not being narcissistic or self involved. Yeah, she&#039;s brainy, and like Carson, I feel like I&#039;m looking at her grey matter and thinking, oh, those ridges and tunnels-- I mean, you want to run your fingers through them-- her intellect is of this sort of quality that feels very much grounded in the body, somehow.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>An arresting, intelligent review&#8211;<br />
You touch lightly on issues of the sort of enigmatic sensuality in her work that I think also parallel Carson, so they are alike in more ways than lack of cover jacket photo. I think this is part of what makes the work intimate enough to be compelling while very definately not being narcissistic or self involved. Yeah, she&#8217;s brainy, and like Carson, I feel like I&#8217;m looking at her grey matter and thinking, oh, those ridges and tunnels&#8211; I mean, you want to run your fingers through them&#8211; her intellect is of this sort of quality that feels very much grounded in the body, somehow.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Susan Denning</title>
		<link>http://www.constantcritic.com/ray_mcdaniel/columbarium/comment-page-1/#comment-90</link>
		<dc:creator>Susan Denning</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Oct 2003 18:50:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.constantcritic.test/ray_mcdaniel/columbarium#comment-90</guid>
		<description>I enjoyed Ray McDaniel&#039;s review of Columbarium - I am a Susan Stewart fan from way back. &lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
However, I think ERASURE is not the imporant thing. I think what the erasure is being replaced by is what makes poetry like this compelling - and why contemporary poetry often falls short of the mark.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Also I would disagree that the climate is DOMINATED by poets who want to win at show and tell. I think the current culture is yes dominated by that - but the poetic culture seems to be involved in a  kind of tug or war between witness to personal experience on the one hand and witness to personal erasure on the other (I know,I know, news flash!)..&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
So I don&#039;t think you would praise someone just because they take themselves out of the equation.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Which is not, even, what I think Ray was doing. &lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
so at this point... I&#039;m just rambling.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
anyway -  I enjoyed the review! Don&#039;t make fun of me,  I wrote this on my lunch hour.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Best,&lt;br&gt;
Susan Denning</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I enjoyed Ray McDaniel&#8217;s review of Columbarium &#8211; I am a Susan Stewart fan from way back. </p>
<p>However, I think ERASURE is not the imporant thing. I think what the erasure is being replaced by is what makes poetry like this compelling &#8211; and why contemporary poetry often falls short of the mark.</p>
<p>Also I would disagree that the climate is DOMINATED by poets who want to win at show and tell. I think the current culture is yes dominated by that &#8211; but the poetic culture seems to be involved in a  kind of tug or war between witness to personal experience on the one hand and witness to personal erasure on the other (I know,I know, news flash!)..</p>
<p>So I don&#8217;t think you would praise someone just because they take themselves out of the equation.</p>
<p>Which is not, even, what I think Ray was doing. </p>
<p>so at this point&#8230; I&#8217;m just rambling.</p>
<p>anyway &#8211;  I enjoyed the review! Don&#8217;t make fun of me,  I wrote this on my lunch hour.</p>
<p>Best,<br />
Susan Denning</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
