<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Steal Away (Part II of Raymond McDaniel&#8217;s Consideration)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.constantcritic.com/ray_mcdaniel/steal_away_part_ii/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.constantcritic.com/ray_mcdaniel/steal_away_part_ii/</link>
	<description>Timely poetry reviews</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 07 Aug 2010 11:09:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: W.B. Keckler</title>
		<link>http://www.constantcritic.com/ray_mcdaniel/steal_away_part_ii/comment-page-1/#comment-92</link>
		<dc:creator>W.B. Keckler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Dec 2003 00:58:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.constantcritic.test/ray_mcdaniel/steal_away_(part_ii_of_raymond_mcdaniels_consideration)#comment-92</guid>
		<description>Dear Editor,&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
    Through some wandering serendipity, an email reached me with a link to Ray McDaniel&#039;s review of a book I just ordered--C.D. Wright&#039;s Steal Away.  I must say after reading his eloquent review of an author I&#039;ve admired for some time, I want to call the post office and ask them to start up a little earlier tomorrow morning so I can really get lost in the books by C.D. Wright I&#039;ve not had the fortune to see yet.  One I did pick up was  Deep Step, Come Shining, and I agree with R.M.&#039;s assessment of that benchmark.   The critic does a great job of foregrounding what are clearly darker, autonomically grounded obsessions of the author without being dismissive or falling back on a relegation to the baroque.  I would submit that the section he quotes with the rubric &quot;Lake Echo, Dear&quot; must surely owe its genesis to Michael Palmer&#039;s Notes for Echo Lake suite.  That passage reads uncannily like Palmer, and if you read that phrase backwards you seem to see an address to Palmer or the texts themselves: &quot;Dear Echo Lake...&quot;  Keep up the great work.  Hume&#039;s review of Berssenbrugge&#039;s Nest was amazing for its concise wit and perception into the poet&#039;s ongoing obsession with apperception.  W.B. Keckler</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear Editor,</p>
<p>    Through some wandering serendipity, an email reached me with a link to Ray McDaniel&#8217;s review of a book I just ordered&#8211;C.D. Wright&#8217;s Steal Away.  I must say after reading his eloquent review of an author I&#8217;ve admired for some time, I want to call the post office and ask them to start up a little earlier tomorrow morning so I can really get lost in the books by C.D. Wright I&#8217;ve not had the fortune to see yet.  One I did pick up was  Deep Step, Come Shining, and I agree with R.M.&#8217;s assessment of that benchmark.   The critic does a great job of foregrounding what are clearly darker, autonomically grounded obsessions of the author without being dismissive or falling back on a relegation to the baroque.  I would submit that the section he quotes with the rubric &#8220;Lake Echo, Dear&#8221; must surely owe its genesis to Michael Palmer&#8217;s Notes for Echo Lake suite.  That passage reads uncannily like Palmer, and if you read that phrase backwards you seem to see an address to Palmer or the texts themselves: &#8220;Dear Echo Lake&#8230;&#8221;  Keep up the great work.  Hume&#8217;s review of Berssenbrugge&#8217;s Nest was amazing for its concise wit and perception into the poet&#8217;s ongoing obsession with apperception.  W.B. Keckler</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
